EIAS LATEST

EU Semiconductor Policy: What ESMC Reveals About Europe’s Joint Venture Strategy

The Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), which produces the most advanced chips in the world, is positioning itself in a strategic position in the global economy. On one hand, the geopolitical tensions and domestic resource constraints are pushing TSMC to diversify manufacturing overseas. On the other, the European Union seeks to attract investment through the European Chips Act to reduce dependence on external suppliers. It has resulted in the EU–TSMC joint venture “European Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (ESMC)”, a pilot initiative to assess whether TSMC’s efficient production model can be adopted to Europe. Although the European Chips Act provides subsidies, it fails to address the underlying structural barrier. The sustained EU–TSMC semiconductor ecosystem cannot be built with financial support alone, but requires comprehensive reforms to address regulatory fragmentation across the EU’s single market and knowledge transfer through TSMC’s production and management model. Therefore, to strengthen EU–TSMC cooperation, prioritising regulatory simplification, reducing administrative fragmentation and establishing an exchange and training scheme that facilitates efficiency and training programmes that support operational learning from TSMC’s business model.

Read More »

Critical Minerals, Critical Rights: EU-India CRM Cooperation and Indigenous Land Safeguards

As the EU leverages the 2026 Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and its Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) to diversify CRM supply chains, India becomes a strategic supplier of minerals such as bauxite, lithium, and rare earths. Yet CRM extraction and mining in India has long intersected with indigenous (Adivasi) rights conflicts, where deposits on or near indigenous lands trigger disputes over land acquisition, forest rights, and community consent. India’s formal framework, including the Fifth and Sixth Schedules, PESA, and the Forest Rights Act (FRA), offers robust protections, but implementation gaps and corporate pressures endure. FTA‑driven CRM expansion risks deepening Adivasi land rights conflicts unless EU‑level due diligence and sustainability commitments are matched with effective, consent-based safeguards at the local level. The credibility of CRM‑linked, value‑based supply chains depends on the EU aligning its green‑industrial ambitions with effective protection of Adivasi land rights, as well as on India’s capacity to put Free, Prior and Informed Consent-like (FPIC) safeguards into concrete practice.

Read More »

The EU’s Global Gateway in the Pacific: a pragmatic opening for reorienting European cable security

Submarine-cable security has arrived on the European agenda as a sabotage problem, and the European Union has answered it well: a comprehensive Cable Security Toolbox built on operational resilience rather than perfect protection. Read against the empirical record, however, the threat lies elsewhere. Cable damage is overwhelmingly accidental and, in Europe, declining; what climate change alters is not why cables fail but how badly a failure ends. That acute risk concentrates in the Pacific Island Countries, where the cable is second-order infrastructure with first-order consequences: often a nation’s only link, with repair capacity an ocean away and failures that escape the legal and disaster-risk architectures meant to record them. The Toolbox already points the right way. What it invites is not a new instrument but a change of orientation: carrying proven repair, detection and reporting know-how outward, in coordination with partners and on Pacific terms.

Read More »