CBAM: Barrier or Bridge for EU-China Trade?

Climate governance may be one of the few areas where the EU and China still possess overlapping interests. CBAM could either worsen tensions by forming the basis for another trade dispute, or it could create a narrow but meaningful space for technical cooperation around verification, data quality and standards.


The world’s first Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) entered its definitive phase in January 2026, with the European Union reporting the successful implementation of ‘real-time data exchange, efficient validation of declarants, and uninterrupted import procedures at EU external borders’. 

This marks an important step in the EU’s attempt to turn climate ambition into a practical tool for cleaner and fairer global supply chains. But CBAM’s long-term success will depend on more than smooth border procedures. At its core lies a more complicated challenge: developing credible systems for verifying carbon emissions at product level across complex international supply chains. This capability remains uneven globally, particularly among exporters in developing economies. As a result, CBAM continues to rely on a fallback mechanism: where actual verified emissions data are unavailable, importers may use default values. Since these values are often conservative, firms unable to substantiate their actual emissions may face a higher CBAM liability than their real carbon footprint would otherwise justify. 

Author: Carmen Leong, Junior Researcher

Photo credits: Pixabay